Is it worth grading?
Pokémon cards ranked by estimated PSA grading return vs selling raw (est.). Updated July 12, 2026.
For every card with a real PSA census, Riffle estimates the graded outcome from the card’s own gem rate and current graded market prices, subtracts a ~$25/card bulk-rate grading fee, and compares it against selling the card ungraded. The edge shown is that difference — a derived estimate, not a promise. Estimates, not financial advice.
Ahead after fees (est.)
FAQ
How do I know if a Pokémon card is worth grading?
Compare what the card is expected to be worth graded against what it sells for raw. Riffle estimates the graded outcome from each card's own PSA gem rate and current graded market prices — gem rate × PSA 10 value plus (1 − gem rate) × PSA 9 value — subtracts a ~$25/card bulk-rate grading fee, and compares that to the card's ungraded market price. A positive edge means grading is estimated to net more than selling raw; within about $10 either way is a wash.
Why isn't the exact PSA 9 or PSA 10 price shown?
The ranking and per-card verdicts are Riffle's derived figures and are free to cite. The underlying PSA 9/10 market prices, full graded history, and comps are part of Riffle premium.
Does a positive grading edge guarantee a profit?
No. The estimate assumes a near-mint raw copy at bulk-rate grading; centering risk, sub-9 grades, turnaround time, and shipping aren't included. It's a screen for which cards deserve a closer look, not financial advice.
Verdicts assume a near-mint raw copy at bulk-rate grading (~$25/card; standard service costs more) and ignore centering risk, sub-9 grades, turnaround time, and shipping. Gem rates come from the PSA population census Riffle captures monthly; the exact PSA 9/10 prices behind each verdict are part of Riffle premium. Estimates, not financial advice.